Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Free-Standing Branemark Osseointegrated Implants¿Í Two-part I. T. I. Dental Implats(Bonefit)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÇÏ¾Ç ¾çÃø ´ë±¸Ä¡ °á¼Õ ¼öº¹¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû ¿¬±¸(I)

FIXED/REMOVABLE RECONSTRUCTION IN PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENT USING BRANEMARK OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS AND TWO-PART I.T. I. IMPLANTS(BONEFIT) AS ABUTMENTS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀ̽ÄÇÐȸÁö 1992³â 12±Ç 1È£ p.213 ~ 224
¾çÀçÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾çÀçÈ£ ( Yang Jae-Ho ) - Seoul National University College of Dentistry Deptarment of Prosthodontics

Abstract


The author installed 3 .75mm X 10mm Branemark osseointegrated implants and 3 .5mm X 8mm I. T. I hollow screw implants(Bonefit) as a free standing abutment to replace lower left and right molars of 44-year-old female patient. Form the foregoing procedure, the author obtained the following results. 1. Free-standing Branemark and I. T. I. Hollow screw implants(Bonefit) could be used to replace molars effectively without reduction of adjacent natural teeth, 2. Rotation of occlusal gold screw of Branemark implants was observed under occlusal force. 3. Adjustment of height of I. T. I. abutments was necessary in the mandibular second molar because of the limited occlusal clearance. 4. Form the oral examination, patient comments, panoramic and periapical radiographs, there were no pain, gingival imflammation and mobility, but slight reduction of alveolar bone level was shown around both implant systems. 5. Patient comments were comfortable on both systems, but the patient complained about economic problem of Branemark system and long treatment treatment time of both systems.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸